Sunday, August 16, 2009

Dead Cat, FOD, Phone Call


The national media was quick to force blame on the controller involved in the deadly plane/helo crash over the Hudson. Days later news reports blame the controller for having an inappropriate conversation on the phone with his girlfriend. Some news reports said the controller was able to see both aircraft on radar while other reports disagree. So what is the bottom line?


The controller launched the piper. The controller gave the piper the option of the river route and he accepted.(pilots flying this route are well aware of the tourist travel) The controller switched the piper to local Newark. The plane never made the switch. The controller attempted to quote traffic. The planes hit. Keep in mind flying over the Hudson is uncontrolled airspace and the weather was clear. Visual flight rules were in play. So why was the controller on the phone?


Turns out their was a dead cat on one of the taxiway's at Teterboro airport. The controller was on the phone with the airport authority(not his girlfriend) trying to get the cat(fod) off the taxiway. If their was a dead cat on my taxiway I would probably joke with the airport employee as well. " how the heck did that darn cat make it out their?"


The bottom line is this, the two events are not linked. The phone call and the crash have nothing in common. If anyone should be in trouble it is the supervisor who was not in his place of work. If he was properly managing his shift he would have been the one on the phone having the dead cat removed from the airport. It is a sham the controller is being dragged through the mud. The FAA is just trying to hide the contract story in the media.


Jacko


Here is the latest on this story:




Nasty response posted at FEDSMITH.COM

This was posted on the website www.fedsmith.com.

I just finished reading the agreement and although I believe unions are needed in the government, this one is definitely not and I urge the federal community to get a copy and read it, as it will sicken both unions and management. It reads like a manifesto and you would get the impression that the FAA union were bargaining with another air traffic controller and guess what, that's who Obama selected to run the FAA. Nine percent a year for three years is pretty good money while this nation suffers unemployment and hard times, but it is the language of the contract that blows you out of the water and my condolences go out to the managers that must deal with this pompous and arrogant union and did I say cry baby's. It is time for us to realize that these controllers do not walk on water and have no more stress than a nurse running a heart lung machine at any VA hospital in this nation. I again urge you to get a copy of this new contract and read it and the verbiage is pure Socialism.

When I made the statement above, I had not read each page verbatim, but now that I have, I now must ask why can this contract get past the so called overseers of the government. (Congress) I urge all labor leaders government wide to ask for the same perks contained in this contract and I will bet my first child that management would laugh you out of the room, but ask anyway, now that you have a template to work off. President Reagan rightfully fired the controllers for putting the public at risk and these men and women have been crying foul ball ever since, but putting that aside, how did this contract slide right by the noses of the folks that are suppose to be on top of this? Please read it and it might be hard to get a copy right now, but I urge ATCs nation wide to vote this down and you might ask why? You belong to a well respected union and the nation is thankful for your dedication and professionalism, but the nation will look at you much more differently should you vote yes.

signed
a plain old manager of the VA.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Uncontrolled airspace accident = Suspension? What?

The Federal Aviation Administration has suspended the air traffic controller and his supervisor on shift at Teterboro Airport at the time of Saturday's Hudson River mid-air collision that left 9 people dead.

The FAA released the following statement on Thursday evening: "In conjunction with the FAA's participation in the National Transportation Safety Board's inquiry into the recent Hudson River accident, we learned that the controller handling the Piper flight was involved in apparently inappropriate conversations on the telephone at the time of the accident. "We also learned that the supervisor was not present in the building as required.

While we have no reason to believe at this time that these actions contributed to the accident, this kind of conduct is unacceptable and we have placed the employees on administrative leave and have begun disciplinary proceedings. "We respect the NTSB's authority in determining the cause of the accident and will continue to work closely with NTSB investigators."The air traffic controller on duty was in radio contact with the doomed aircraft, but he was also on a separate line with his girlfriend, according to an angry senior administration official, the Daily News reported Thursday evening.The National Air Traffic Controllers Association, the labor union representing controllers, said in a statement that it supports a full investigation of the allegations "before there is a rush to judgment."

The FAA's action came as an amateur video surfaced that captured the moment of impact between the two aircraft. The images, taken by an Italian man practicing with a new camera while on a boat tour, shows the helicopter flying overhead when suddenly a single-engine plane appears behind it, apparently climbing and turning. The plane clips the helicopter's rotor blades, and a wing shears off. Debris rains down, and the plane flips. Both aircraft plunge toward the water.

On the video, aired Thursday on "NBC Nightly News," one or more onlookers can be heard in the background saying, "Oh, my God!"Teterboro Airport, located directly across the Hudson River from New York City near the George Washington Bridge, handles corporate and private aircraft.It is operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and handles nearly 200,000 flights a year.In the wake of the tragic crash, the FAA is considering requiring more safety measures for low-flying aircraft in the New York City, FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt said Thursday. The FAA has already sent pilots a reminder on several long-recommended precautions for flying in the visual flight zone in the congested Hudson River corridor on the west side of Manhattan. Among them are tuning radios to frequencies where the pilots communicate with one another, flying at speeds under 140 knots and turning on aircraft lights.

Babbitt, speaking after touring the FAA Technical Center at Atlantic City International Airport, said the radio communications might have prevented the crash Saturday between a small plane and a sightseeing helicopter. "They were given traffic alerts," he said. "However, neither of the pilots was on the frequencies." Babbitt said his agency has been helping the National Transportation Safety Board, which is investigating the crash. He said that while his agency will review any recommendations the NTSB makes, it will also make rule changes sooner if it sees a need. The FAA has already formed a task force to study issues for the congested areas where visual flight rules apply at low altitudes, Babbitt said. Saturday's crash happened at about 1,100 feet, a space between the lower level where visual flight rules apply and the higher altitude where air traffic controllers guide pilots.


Supervisor was not in the tower? NO, Really? You don't say? Forget about the contract, NATCA has to defend this controller. It was not in his airspace and vfr. rules are rules.

Jacko

ps- expect a lot of posts, news is flying out of control!

Thursday, August 13, 2009

FAA quick to inform the National Media.

The FAA is ecstatic!!! If you yahoo search or google FAA you will see tons of links about today's contract news. They were johnny on the spot ready to roll out the news. Makes me wonder if they had a heads up before us? I wonder how the national media will react if the contract fails to ratify? Here is a posting from the propaganda machine.

FAA, NATCA Labor Agreement Announced
August 13, 2009 –

The FAA and National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) have reached a labor agreement after nearly three months of mediation.

“This marks a new day between the FAA and the air traffic controllers as we move forward with a spirit of cooperation,” said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. “We are hopeful that once the review and ratification are complete, we can accelerate our efforts to adopt NextGen, the next generation air transportation system.”

"This tentative agreement marks a turning point in the relationship between the FAA and its air traffic controller, and traffic management employees,” said Patrick Forrey, president of NATCA. “We look forward to working with the FAA and the aviation industry and community in a collaborative process to develop and implement the much-needed next generation aviation system."

The mediation process used to reach the agreement will serve as a model for future contract negotiations with all FAA employee unions. More than 100 issues were settled through the process. Five issues were decided by the arbitration team. NATCA members have 45 days to ratify the mediated issues that were settled during negotiations. The five issues decided by the arbitrators are not subject to ratification by NATCA members.

The three-year agreement provides controllers with greater flexibility in their work schedules, childcare support, and a new grievance review process, among other gains. The FAA retains the flexibility to more effectively redeploy controllers to congested airports using incentive pay.
The agreement also restores a more equitable pay standard for new hires and veterans nearing retirement.

The cost of the agreement will be phased in over the three years of the contract so that the agency will not have to tap into its budget for critical capital investments.
The full contract is posted at the following links:

Tentatively Agreed Upon Articles (PDF)Arbitration Panel's Mediation Solution Award (PDF)

I am not sure what to say? This is what I have come to expect. The information can always have a spin added, depending on the desired outcome.

Jacko

Jackass of the Day Award

It has been a while since I have issued a Jackass award. With everything that happened today I felt it was my duty to issue the following :


1) Ray Lahood - Secretary of Transportation. I knew we were in trouble when President Obama selected a right wing republican to this post.





2) Randy Babbitt - Federal Aviation Administrator. Vowed to increase morale within his agency. After this contract I wonder where his agency will rank against other government agency's? 216 out of 216?




3) Pat Forrey - President of the National Air Traffic Controllers Union. The FAA must have offered Forrey some Kool Aid during the mediation. His lack of communication and failure to abide by NEB regulations resulted in him losing the election.




It is my honor to award the above mentioned individuals with the coveted Jackass Award. Congratulations on a job well done.




Jacko

Arbitrated Articles.

The gentleman that run the blog http://currentandundertow.blogspot.com/ have been kind enough to upload all of the arbitrated articles to their website. If you do not have access to the NATCA members only site, you can view them here.

Jacko

Whats the Deal?

Lets cut to the chase. the old guys got screwed, the young guys will be made whole over 3 years. Overall with all of the TAU articles included the new contract receives a grade of C. i issue the grade of C because the old guys got bent over. Three years later and no back pay, no adjustment of the high three, and 1.5% raise and 1.5% lump sum for the next three years.

What does all of this mean? I think it means a new wave of retirements. What was keeping a majority of the eligible controllers from retirement was the contract. now that they know what is in store for them they will walk. They can get more cost of living increase staying home than they can at work.

So after reading the BBS today I feel a majority of the membership is upset with NATCA. I am NOT going to jump ship, and would never consider this. I have voiced my views on the soon to be former president and i come to one conclusion. Jane Garvey had an agenda. The mediators had an agenda. The FAA had an agenda. The white house had an agenda. The agenda was to screw the old guys to make them retire. The agenda was to screw NATCA to send a message to other unions. Only time will tell the repercussions of this agreement.

So what is next? Do we ratify or do we vote down the contract as a sign of disgust? I am torn. If we vote not to ratify we leave the door open to an outcome we might hate more. It will be a tough decision that everyone has to make based solely on how it will affect the personally.

It has been a long morning with emotions high and full of anticipation and an afternoon with confusion and a feeling as if someone died. I don't know where we go from here. I fear for the future of NATCA, I fear for our profession.